Doing what's right and explaining
why it's right are two different practices requiring two different skill
sets (hence - training).
A good teacher must do
both.
Table of Content / List of Posts
From being a Teach-er to becoming a Teach-smith: the transformation of this Century.
An English dictionary grows every
year. An English language is alive. Many words we use today have been
invented some time ago. A linguist knows that a structure of a word often
reflects the original meaning of the word even if over time that meaning has
evolved. Many English verbs end with “-er”; a speaker, a driver, a teacher.
Often verbs like that express a simple action: a speaker is one that speaks,
meaning – puts words forward; a driver is one that drives, meaning – moves
thing ahead; a teacher is one that teaches, meaning – instructs students (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/teacher),
tells students what to do.
The meaning of teaching as “telling
what to do” has been known for thousands of years. A teacher had specific
knowledge and skills and in order to gain that knowledge and skills students
had to follow the instructions, and they had to do it word-by-word,
literally.
Social and economic development,
world exploration, industrialization had led to the growing need in more and
more literal workforce. Eventually, teaching has become a professional practice
which structure reflects the economic structure of the society. The goal
of teaching was to equip students with solid and specific knowledge and skills.
Up to fifty years ago, or by a
historical scale “just yesterday”, the economic structure of the society has
been changing reality slowly. One could learn one profession and keep working
until the retirement using almost the same set of skills.
Things are very different
nowadays.
Globalization, robotization, informatization,
the Internet have
led to the creation of fast and constantly changing social and economic
environment. More and more professionals will have to relearn their profession
or even change it during their professional life time; maybe even more than
twice. More and more professionals will have to go through the process of
professional re-adaptation (retraining) during their
professional life time; maybe even more than twice.
That means that more and more people
will need to have not just specific professional skills (learned once and
forever), but also meta skills, required for being able to adapt to the changes
in the environment (professional environment, social environment, economic
environment, political environment, physical environment – a.k.a. a climate).
That means that nowadays, teachers
need to teach students not just specific practical skills (how to read, to
write, to count, etc.), but also meta-skills, required for being able to adapt
to the changes in their future life (due to the changes in their professional
environment, social environment, economic environment, political environment,
physical environment – a.k.a. a climate).
The discussion of how to teach
students and at the same time help them with developing and advancement of
those meta-skills is not new, and has no single point of view (I also address
it in my book: “Becoming a STEM Teacher”).
But one thing is clear for
sure; one cannot learn how to adapt to
a changing environment if the environment where one learns does
not change, if it is still, steady, stationary, fixed.
One more time - because this
statement contradicts many established teaching approaches, strategies, and even desires of
teachers, parents, administrators, and researchers.
Many teachers would tell us that
classes today are not the same as twenty years ago. That includes the fact that
the student body has been becoming more fluid, more diverse (https://www.greatschools.org/gk/articles/cultural-diversity-at-school/),
less uniform (by all possible measures). More and more ideological emphasis is
being placed on individualization of teaching (which is a hot and controversial
topic: http://www.springer.com/us/book/9781402036194).
In theory, many educators already
say that they are for the individualization of teaching. But the practical
realization encounters many difficulties and obstacles. One such obstacle is
ideological: individualization of teaching requires a new view on the role
of a teacher, which is completely opposite to the old-fashioned
well-established view “a teacher is one who tells students what to
do”.
Creating for students evolving,
progressing, individualized learning environment requires – before all –
being professionally creative, progressive individual.
Interestingly, English language uses a different word structure for (at least some) professions which have a creative nature. Take, for example, a professional who makes locks. This profession does not exist anymore, but the in the past, one who made locks was called a locksmith. He was not called a locker (or unlocker), because that would mean “one who locks or unlocks locks”. Those days every lock had to be created.
Interestingly, English language uses a different word structure for (at least some) professions which have a creative nature. Take, for example, a professional who makes locks. This profession does not exist anymore, but the in the past, one who made locks was called a locksmith. He was not called a locker (or unlocker), because that would mean “one who locks or unlocks locks”. Those days every lock had to be created.
There are other professions, like
blacksmith, tunesmith (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tunesmith) which
presume from a professional some creative work. In Merriam-Webster one finds
that “smith” means “a person who makes things” (http://www.learnersdictionary.com/definition/smith).
Following this pattern, a person
who creates learning environment for students should not be called “a teacher”
but should be called “a teachsmith”! (I wish I was the first one to
come up with this term, but Google said I wasn’t :)
Using this terminology, we can
describe the goal of the currently undergoing education reform in one short
sentence:
“The reform is a transition from
being
a teach-er to becoming a teach-smith”.
If we accept this meaning of
the education reform, we have to take a closer look at the current state of the
field of teacher professional development (www.GoMars.xyz/cash.html).
Like many other contemporary
professionals, teachsmiths will also need robust meta-skills required
for reoccurring need to re-adapt to the changes happening in their professional
field (a.k.a. education). That means, that teacher professional development
should also go beyond providing training in just specific content knowledge, or
class management skills.
It is interesting to observe that
sometimes under the banner of “teaching students how to think” some educators
propose that the goal of teaching has changed; namely, it is not to equip
students with solid and specific knowledge and skill, but provide students with
an “empowering learning experience”. However, what does “empowering learning experience”
mean, and more importantly, how to measure it, remains to be a mystery. Some
educators might find this as a plus, because it eliminates the accountability
from teaching. I would think, this is a misleading substitution of the goals
with the boundaries. Providing an empowering learning experience is the limits
within which a teacher has to design and conduct his/her teaching practice;
e.g. a teacher cannot scream at students, cannot hit students with a ruler,
needs to motivate students toward learning, prevent students from boredom. But that
is NOT the goal of teaching! The goal of teaching is and always will be to
equip students with solid and specific knowledge and skill, because that is
required for accomplishing the mission of education
– enabling people to succeed in life.
And in order to be able to fulfill
the mission, a teacher has to professionally and personally grow for a long
period of time. Graduating from a teacher school is just a beginning of a long
path. And the first thing all teachers need to accept is that in order to teach others teachers have to
learn first how to teach themselves.
My professional journey
from a teacher to a teachsmith was long and wavy, but not unique, and
has many shareable elements common to every professionally growing educator.
Obviously, I am in debt to my parents, my teachers, my mentors, friends, and colleagues; without them I would never have become who I am now.
One of the most efficient methods for advancing a new type of teacher professional development is called “Professional Designing”
Obviously, I am in debt to my parents, my teachers, my mentors, friends, and colleagues; without them I would never have become who I am now.
One of the most efficient methods for advancing a new type of teacher professional development is called “Professional Designing”
Thank you for visiting,
Dr. Valentin Voroshilov
Education Advancement Professionals
P.S. Differentiating, individualized learning, personalized learning have
become a buzz words. The adepts say that since different students learn at
different pace, teachers need to make corresponded adjustments. Sounds about
right, however, the actual realization comes in the form of computerized
training. Basically, students
are being treated like circus animals.
To learn more about my professional experience:
