Thursday, February 15, 2018

Dr. Voroshilov: a peek inside.

Hello, fellow Visitor. 
I hope this post will help you to learn better what kind of a person I am.
I am a very open person.
I say (write) what I think (unless it would greatly jeopardize the well-being of my family). 
The way I sound (or read) may be different from the way people talk (or write) in other cultures, but I never want to make people I talk to feel bad about themselves (sometimes I may want to nudge a person to think about some tough questions, but that's that). Some people say that I have a dry sense of humor. I think it is better than having no sense of humor at all.
I have been trying to find a short but clear description of who I am, 
what I like,
what I believe in.

Here is what I got so far.
I am absolutely convinced that any extremism is bad.

Any idea, even a very good one, if taken to its extremes becomes its own opposite.
Every good idea can be severely compromised by its poor implementation (which is often happen by taking it to the extreme).
That is why I am extremely anti-extremist.
Below is how I want to see myself (of course, the reality puts its limits and corrections; there is always a difference between how we see ourselves in our dreams, and in a mirror).
I am (I wish!)
A conservative liberal
A knowledgeable wonderer
A believing atheist
A constructive disruptor
A logical artist
A loyal oppositionist
A passive activist
A modest braggart
and
A serious laugher
© Dr. Valentin Voroshilov 

I was lucky to work side-by-side with extremely smart and educated people, including my mentors - people who taught me that there are only two rules for becoming a master: 1. learn from the masters; 2. constantly push yourself. My mentors had an incredible knowledge of human nature. People, who “by a single look at a raindrop could deduce the existence of the oceans”. People, who walked toward a challenge and found a pleasure in solving complicated problems. People who would tell things as they are. People who taught me what does it mean to be a professional, including the five top professional qualities: curiosity, imagination, an ability to reason, an ability to laugh at themselves, and having strict criteria for the quality of their own work. The type of people to whom I feel deep admiration and respect.

All my actions are limited by 3 rules: 
1. nothing illegal; 
2. nothing stupid; 
3. learn from mistakes (sh@t happens). 
Everything else, e.g. opinions, traditions, views, emotions, is relative, hence irrelevant. History of science demonstrates that even the most widely accepted views can (and did) become outdated and be replaced. 

As a long-term teacher, at times I may be judgmental, and may challenge people, but I have trained myself to keep it down.
As a person of science,  I believe, there should be no gaps or disconnections between laws, moral rules, and the actual social culture (a physics teacher is a diagnosis!). 
There is a type of people who I try to avoid: people who are arrogant, full of themselves, believe they know everything and tell everyone what to do, people who try to avoid logical conversations and always silence the opponents by loudly screaming emotional trivialities and calling people names.
Those people, who do not represent the majority, may come in all possible forms: all genders, races, ages, wealth, education, status.
Those people demand to be treated with the utmost respect, but do not respect anybody else.

Those people break the Golden Rule, but often demand that it would be used toward them.
The Golden Rule does not mention race, gender, ethnicity, age, IQ, education, wealth, religion, political bias, the planet of birth.
I guess, this is one of the reasons Stephen Colbert (I like him, but not as much as I liked Jon Stewart) repeatedly has said "I do not see race". Well, following this logic, and the Golden Rule, we all should say "I do not see gender", "I do not see ethnicity", "I do not see IQ", "I do not see age", "I do not see education", "I do not see wealth", "I do not see religion", "I do not see political bias", "I do not see an alien".
The problem, however, is that for someone to actually follow the Golden Rule, that one needs to have:
- an ability to see how other people see other persons - a.k.a. imagination.

- an ability to see how other people see himself/herself, a.k.a. reflection.
- the willingness for "trying on  someone else shoes", a.k.a. caring.




Ask anyone "Do you want to be lied upon, told untruth, deceived?" The natural asnwer is "No, I don't". But that means that when one lies one breaks the Golden Rule.
Ask anyone "Do you want to be used by others as a tool, as an instrument for their benefits, as a step in their life ladder?" The natural asnwer is "No, I don't". But that means that one who uses people as tools, instruments breaks the Golden Rule.
These are some of my favorite sayings (meaning, I love them, but I did not invent them):
“If you didn't succeed first time, try and try again.”
“Repeating again and again the same actions and expecting a different result is an insanity.”

"Question always; question everything; question everyone".
These are mine:
"Mistakes are inevitable and unavoidable. There is no shame in making a mistake. The shame is in insisting that you're right even when even you already know that you are not."
“If you look in a mirror, and do not like what you see, do not blame the mirror.”
(BTW: a mirror is an object or a person interaction with which activates the process of reflection on (a) personal appearance; (b) external environment; or (c) internal psychological state).

I am a successful professional. I have my share of achievements (as well as mistakes), and I am proud of those achievements. It shows that I am not just someone who "says the right things". 
I also do the right things (at least try my best).
The fastest way to make an impression of my professional experience is to follow theses steps (the complete reading should not take more then 20 to 30 minutes):
1. go to www.Cognicity.How and just scroll down the page, to get visual representation of the topics I am interested in, and also my productivity.
2. go to www.Gomars.XYZ and do the same.
3. go to "The Proof of The Professional Success" and read it. Well, after the first couple of pages of the student feedback one can jump to the Elevator Pitch, and the rest.
4. Then I would recommend to read:
"The Importance of Early Exposure to Thinking"
"Is The Cat Worth To Be Saved?"
"Relax! The Real AI is Not Coming any soon!"
"The Biggest Lie of The Humanity"
"Thinking As a Physicists" 
Of course, I would like if everyone would read at least the third of my posts on this blog, but that is a wishful thinking.
I know I am not "the most interesting man in the world". But I hope that this short introduction at least will make me to be seen as just interesting.


Table of content
Thank you for visiting,
Dr. Valentin Voroshilov
Education Advancement Professionals
GoMars.xyz

To learn more about my professional experience:
The voices of my students 
"The Backpack Full of Cash": pointing at a problem, not offering a solution
Essentials of Teaching Science

Dear Visitor, please, feel free to use the buttons below to share your feelings (ANY!) about this post to your Twitter of Facebook followers.